Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
ETH Zurich •
Épilepsie, Parkinson
Suivi actifNon applicable
Résumé
Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
est développé par ETH Zurich.
Le traitement est actuellement en Non applicable.
Il est associé à Épilepsie, Parkinson.
Son objectif thérapeutique principal est Traitement symptomatique.
Le statut actuel est : suivi actif.
À vérifier
Traitement symptomatique
Non applicable
ETH Zurich
Switzerland
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a gold-standard symptomatic treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) and is also explored for a variety of other neurological disorders. The implantation of electrodes into deep brain areas has not only enabled the application of electrical stimuli, but has also provided researchers and clinicians with an unprecedented window to investigate aberrant neuronal activity right at the core of pathological brain circuits. Local field potentials (LFP) have already been readily investigated through externalised DBS electrode wires prior to internalisation and connection to an implantable neurostimulator. In the case of PD, motor symptoms have been evidenced to correlate with exaggerated beta oscillatory activity (13-35 Hz) in the LFP recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Firstly, beta activity recorded in the STN at rest in patients withdrawn from their medication has been correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) across patients. Secondly, a reduction of signal power in the beta-band was correlated with clinical improvements of motor symptoms. Thirdly, the two main therapeutic strategies, the administration of L-Dopa, and high-frequency DBS both lead to a suppression of beta-synchronicity in the STN. Furthermore, beta-oscillations show fast and movement-dependent modulation over time and can serve as a biomarker and feedback signal to control the delivery of DBS. The investigators recently implemented deep brain electrical neurofeedback to provide real-time visual neurofeedback of pathological STN oscillations through externalised DBS electrodes and showed that PD patients were able to volitionally control and reduce subthalamic activity within a single 1 hour session. Moreover, neurofeedback-learnt strategies accelerated movements and could be retained in the short- and mid-term. Only recently, a newly developed neurostimulator, the Percept™ PC (Medtronic Neurological Division, Minneapolis, MN, USA), has been clinically approved, which can not only apply electrical impulses, but also enable the measurement and transmission of brain activity. This neurostimulator is now the first choice for implantations at the University Hospital Zurich and is used for a variety of neurological disorders. The investigators' goal is to investigate whether neurofeedback through a fully implanted deep brain stimulation device is possible and can lead to a better control of pathological oscillations as well as symptom mitigation. Having shown that endogenous control over deep brain oscillations is possible, the investigators will also test this novel therapeutic approach for pathologies other than PD that are also treated with DBS. Neurofeedback using implanted DBS electrodes will have the advantage of enabling longer and multiple-day training sessions, which the investigators hypothesise to have a larger impact on control over pathological deep brain oscillations and neurological symptoms, as such a fully implanted neurofeedback system no longer requires the externalisation of DBS wires and is as such no longer limited to the first two days after electrode implantation. All in all, the investigators will not exceed a total streaming time of 7 hours per patients (7 d of battery time), which the investigators deem justifiable with respect to a battery life of \> 5 years. This proposed research is highly significant as it will help our understanding of various neurological diseases that are highly prevalent in society (PD being, for instance, the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease) and might culminate in novel, endogenous treatment strategies. The overall risk for patients is minimal to non-existent, as stimulation parameters are unaffected and the intended changes in brain activity are self-induced while DBS stimulation is off.
Ce pourcentage n’est pas une probabilité de succès clinique.
Il mesure uniquement la force de la classification automatique de l’objectif scientifique. Le calcul part de 45 points, ajoute 7 points par unité de poids du mot-clé le plus fortement détecté, puis est plafonné à 95 %. Exemple : un score maximal de 2 donne 45 + (2 × 7) = 59 %.
Indices détectés : symptom → Traitement symptomatique
Ce score est heuristique et doit être vérifié dans le protocole ou une publication.
Description affichée depuis l’essai compatible NCT05101161, afin d’éviter le mélange entre plusieurs indications d’une même molécule.
Aucune incohérence majeure détectée entre la maladie, l’objectif et la description.
Transparence et qualité de la fiche
données vérifiables
ClassificationCohérente automatiquement
Confiance de la fiche100 %
Source principaleSource officielle ou publication indexée
Dernière vérification2026-09-11
Anomalies détectées0
Validation humaineValidation humaine non effectuée
Donnée issue d’une sourceDonnée normalisée automatiquementInterprétation algorithmique
Classification scientifique multi-axes
ne pas confondre statut et résultat
État de l’étudeRecrutement en cours
Disponibilité des résultatsRésultats à vérifier
InterprétationImpossible à déterminer
Niveau de preuveNon évaluable
Un essai terminé n’est pas nécessairement positif. Un essai arrêté n’est classé comme échec scientifique que lorsqu’un résultat ou une raison explicite le confirme.
Indicateurs factuels
sans score subjectif
Phase enregistréeNon applicable
Études associées1
Publications associées0
Statut consolidéSuivi actif
Aucune chance de succès, note d’innovation, potentiel thérapeutique ou probabilité de commercialisation n’est calculé tant qu’un modèle validé et des données suffisantes ne sont pas disponibles.
Historique factuel de la molécule
5 événement(s) daté(s)
Cette liste reprend uniquement les dates trouvées dans les registres et publications liés. Elle ne constitue pas une prévision.
Date
Événement
Source
2021-09-23
Début de l’étudeNCT05101161
Registre d’essai clinique
2026-09-11
Dernière mise à jour des donnéesNeurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
Ces sources sont proposées pour vérification. Les informations de la fiche doivent être confirmées dans les registres officiels ou les publications originales.